Module Learning Outcomes: Students will synthesize material covered in the cours


Place your order now for a similar assignment and have exceptional work written by our team of experts, At affordable rates

For This or a Similar Paper Click To Order Now

Module Learning Outcomes:
Students will synthesize material covered in the course and textbook and use outside credible research materials to construct and write an argumentative MLA research paper in support of their position. You will demonstrate understanding of course concepts in the research paper by
After researching the issue and looking at both sides of the argument, coming to a logical and ethical conclusion based on critical thinking.
Identifying arguments (at least two for each side of the argument) FOR AND AGAINST your position on the issue. Using sources (articles, statistics, quotes, authorities, and so forth) to support your position. Identifying logical fallacies (at least two) OF THE SIDE OF THE ARGUMENT YOU OPPOSE and identifying which kind of logical fallacy they are.
Evaluate a generalization based on data regarding your issue using the 4 criteria (page 179)
Identifying vagueness or ambiguity of claims on either side of the argument (at least four) Course Level Objectives related to this unit:
Completion of a written, documented, multi-source research project
CURRENT *CONTROVERSIAL* ISSUES: choose one topic and one side:
AGREE: States should be able to make their own decisions regarding abortion. DISAGREE: States should not be able to make their own decisions regarding abortion. AGREE: Mask mandates should return to California. DISAGREE: Mask mandates should not return to California. AGREE: Disney should not take political stands (Florida’s “Parental Rights in Education” bill, Johnny Depp firing, etc). DISAGREE: Disney has a responsibilty to get politically involved.
TOPIC: Using and documenting at least SIX sources (videos are okay!), make a decision based on critical thinking regarding the issue. You must use at least five quotes, MLA style (no “floating” quotes, but quotes with signal phrases).
Floating quote (avoid): “Distribution of the COVID-19 vaccine must be equitable in terms of social justice” (Alvarez).
Quote with signal phrase (yes!): According to the American Civil Liberties Organization, “distribution of the COVID-19 vaccine must be equitable in terms of social justice” (Alvarez).
Assignment: Research a problem and propose a solution, assessing the credibility of sources and accurately documenting all sources.
Write a minimum 1,500 word MLA-style paper (using quotes, a Works Cited page, and in text citation) addressing multiple sides of the issue. Include a one-sentence underlined thesis statement that is your conclusion after careful analysis of the issue. You will be graded for content,organization of ideas, understanding of critical thinking components (see list below), writing style (grammar and word choice), and proper use of MLA style (see links for examples).
Read, analyze, identify, and evaluate the argument using components from our class and textbook, and come to a final conclusion on the issue.
Use your sources (articles, statistics, quotes, authorities, and so forth) to support your position.
Include the following categories: (these can serve as your SUBTOPICS if you wish):
A) Chapter 7: Identify arguments (at least two for each side of the argument) FOR AND AGAINST your position on the issue and evaluate at least ONE of your arguments based on the FOUR TESTS.
B) Chapter 7 (pages 148-153) and Chapter 8: (167-170) : Identify logical fallacies (at least two) OF THE SIDE OF THE ARGUMENT YOU OPPOSE and identify which kind of logical fallacy they are.
C) Chapter 4: Identify vagueness and ambiguity of claims on either side of the argument (at least two total)
D) Consider/address the ethics and how ethics relates to the controversy (Chapter 16)
E) Finally, identify how you have used the FOUR PHASES (226-228) of decision making to make your final decision. This is a brief summary of the Four Phases, though the book goes into much greater details:
1) What were some the possible conclusions on the issue?
2) Which choice was the most attractive or stood out?
3) In compared to the other possible conclusions, why is your option better than the others ?
4) What makes you finally confident in your conclusion? Did you de-emphasize, bolster, trade off, or collapse the other options?
1C Research Paper Rubric
1C Research Paper Rubric
Criteria
Grammar, Punctuation, Spelling, Vocabulary, Sentence Structure and so forth 20%
Evaluate a generalization,, Identify vagueness and ambiguity of claims, Evaluate the Credibility of Claims and Sources, Identify Fallacies, Four PHASES and Consider Ethics 40%
The paper is well organized and easy to read 5%
Citations in the text and the Works Cited page are MLA style 15%
Credible sources are used throughout the paper (at least 5 quotes/paraphrase/summary). Sources are identified for ideas, facts, statistics, and so forth 20%
Total Points: 100.0
1C Research Paper Rubric

For This or a Similar Paper Click To Order Now


Leave a Reply