policy: Commissioners Directive 566-10: Urinalysis, paragraphs 1-8, 22-28, 29-50


Place your order now for a similar assignment and have exceptional work written by our team of experts, At affordable rates

For This or a Similar Paper Click To Order Now

policy: Commissioners Directive 566-10: Urinalysis, paragraphs 1-8, 22-28, 29-50, 54-60
https://www.csc-scc.gc.ca/acts-and-regulations/566-10-cd-eng.shtml
second policy: University of Calgary or Lethbridge College
The purpose of this assignment is to demonstrate your ability to critically defend the functionality of the current policies and procedures that have been assigned to you. You should be able to
Review the two policies you’ve been assigned to focus on and correctly identify vulnerabilities within them, and if you identify none, defend why there are none
Provide a solid rationale for the degree of employee discretion there is in the policy or procedure
Assess how much compliance to these policies and procedures relies on employee professionalism
Identify a privacy vulnerability (weakness) of some significance by reconstructing a scenario you have witnessed and prepare a reasonable plan to address this vulnerability. How would you address the vulnerability?
Identify a Charter of Rights vulnerability (weakness) by reconstructing a scenario you have witnessed and develop a plan to address it with the same standard as the plan regarding privacy. How would you address the vulnerability?
Requirements:
Length: 12-15 pages (excluding title page, reference page and any attachments)

For This or a Similar Paper Click To Order Now


Leave a Reply